(800) 689-1273
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
Prospect Genius logo

Prospect Genius

Menu
Log In
You are here: Home / Blog

Streamline Your Email Marketing Efforts with EmailStream: A Game-Changer for Small Businesses

Last Updated: February 27, 2024

In today’s digital age, small businesses face the constant challenge of staying connected with their customers amidst a sea of competitors. Email marketing remains a vital tool in this endeavor, offering a direct line to your audience’s inboxes. However, the complexity of creating compelling content, assembling campaigns, and scheduling sends can be daunting. This is where Prospect Genius’s EmailStream steps in, offering an innovative solution that streamlines the entire email marketing process, making it more efficient and effective.

A minimalistic landscape illustration that represents a small business sending out a steady flow of emails. The scene includes a small, stylized business establishment on the left, with a stream of paper airplanes representing emails flowing out from it towards the right.

The Power of EmailStream

EmailStream is not just another email marketing tool; it’s a comprehensive service designed with small businesses in mind. It understands the unique challenges you face and offers a seamless solution to engage your customers without overwhelming your schedule. Here’s how EmailStream can benefit your business:

  • Simplified Email Creation: With EmailStream, the daunting task of crafting engaging email content becomes effortless. Propsect Genius’s team of highly experience copywriters will take on the task of creating compelling emails that resonate with your audience.
  • Efficient Campaign Assembly: Gone are the days of juggling multiple tools to assemble your email campaigns. Once your email content is ready, we will build the campaign on your behalf, fully optimized to net you maximum engagement. This not only saves time but also ensures consistency across your campaigns.
  • Automated Scheduling: Keeping up with the optimal sending times can be a puzzle. EmailStream’s automated scheduling takes the guesswork out, ensuring your emails reach your customers when they are most likely to engage.
  • Enhanced Customer Engagement: At its core, EmailStream is about building and maintaining a connection with your customers. By providing a streamlined way to communicate, it helps small businesses keep their audience informed, engaged, and interested in what they have to offer.

Why EmailStream is Essential for Small Businesses

In an era where personalization and engagement are key, EmailStream provides small businesses with the tools to tailor their messages and build meaningful relationships with their customers. It offers a way to regularly update your audience about new products, services, and promotions, keeping your brand top of mind.

Moreover, EmailStream’s efficiency in managing email campaigns frees up valuable time and resources. Small businesses can redirect these towards other aspects of their operations, fostering growth and innovation.

In conclusion, EmailStream by Prospect Genius is more than just an email marketing service. It’s a partnership that empowers small businesses to harness the full potential of their email marketing strategies, ensuring that every campaign is a step towards greater customer engagement and business success. Embrace the future of email marketing with EmailStream and watch your business thrive.

SEO Audit Tools Are Mostly A Scam

Last Updated: February 23, 2024

Our customers often inquire about the results of a free SEO audit tool they’ve utilized on their website. Usually, these audits report numerous issues, from improper setup to sluggish performance, all demanding immediate attention. The way that these tools present their insights with an authoritative tone often convinces users that they are all indeed valid concerns. However, the strategies that these tools use are not always honest. The underlying issue normally lies in the tool’s maker, driven not by altruism but by a profit motive. Their strategy is clear: they attempt to overwhelm their users with data, and then offer to fix the myriad of perceived problems for a fee.

These experiences with our customers have lead us to be skeptical of these tools by default. As a way to better understand these experiences, and in an attempt to provide you (our readers) with some relevant insights, we decided to delve into three of the most popular free SEO audit tools available online. We ran the same website through each tool and meticulously compared the results. Here’s what we discovered: Not only did these three audits fail to concur on the overall assessment of the site, but they also contradicted each other on fundamental points. If these reports are to be trusted, one would expect them to agree on basic and easily quantifiable metrics like, for example, the presence of an SSL certificate.

You can read our detailed review of each report on these previous blog posts:

Here are some of the glaring contradictions we uncovered:

Overall Grade

While one might assume these tools would provide somewhat similar evaluations, our findings were quite the opposite. This suggests that rather than objective assessments, these reports reflect subjective opinions.

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEOmator

Report from SEOmator

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEO Site Checkup

Report from SEO Site Checkup

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEOptimer

Report from SEOptimer

 

Use of HTTP/2 Technology

Despite being adept at detecting specific text or tags, these tools couldn’t even agree on the presence of basic metrics like HTTP/2.

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEOptimer

Report from SEOptimer

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEOmator

Report from SEOmator

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEO Site Checkup

Report from SEO Site Checkup

 

HTTPS Redirect / Use of SSL

Detecting whether a site renders on HTTP or HTTPS is a straightforward task. Yet, these tools couldn’t reach a consensus on this fundamental feature.

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEO Site Checkup

Report from SEO Site Checkup

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEOptimer

Report from SEOptimer

 

Title Tag and Meta Description Length

Determining the optimal length for title tags and meta descriptions isn’t an exact science. While there are recommended character limits for display purposes, exceeding them doesn’t necessarily render the content ineffective. This discrepancy underscores the subjective nature of these tools’ assessments.

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEOmator
Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEOmator

Report from SEOmator

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEO Site Checkup

Report from SEO Site Checkup

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEOptimer

Report from SEOptimer

 

Canonical Tag

Despite the simplicity of detecting the existence of a canonical tag in HTML, these reports couldn’t agree on its presence.

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEOmator

Report from SEOmator

Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEO Site Checkup
Screenshot of SEO audit report from SEO Site Checkup

Report from SEO Site Checkup

 

In conclusion, while these SEO audit tools may offer insights, their accuracy and reliability are questionable. Relying solely on their assessments could lead to misguided decisions. It’s essential to approach such tools with a critical mindset and, when possible, seek expert guidance to ensure the best outcomes for your website’s SEO strategy.

SEO Site Checkup: A Valuable SEO Audit Tool or Another Sales Pitch?

Last Updated: February 23, 2024

SEO Site Checkup offers an intriguing approach to website analysis, spotlighting both strengths and areas where its methodology may not fully serve the average business owner’s needs.

A simplified landscape-oriented scene of a person standing in front of a large, abstract representation of a computer screen displaying various SEO factors as simplified icons (e.g., gears for technical SEO, magnifying glasses for keyword research, and charts for analytics). The person is thoughtfully examining the screen, holding a magnifying glass to look closer at specific icons, symbolizing discernment in choosing SEO strategies.

For this evaluation we used https://rainbowplumbingnj.com/ and the tool is located here: https://seositecheckup.com/analysis. You can view the PDF of the report here.

Here’s an overview based on specific sections of its report:

Poor

  • HTTP/2 Utilization: Conflicting reports on HTTP/2 usage suggest inaccuracies in the tool’s analysis, indicating a potential oversight.
  • Distorted Images Advisory: Flags a non-existent issue of distorted images as a priority, despite no evidence on the site, highlighting a misdirected focus.
  • “Rel=noopener” or “rel=noreferrer” Advice: This detail, while technically sound, is overly minute and unlikely to significantly impact site performance.
  • HTML Page Size Concern: Marks the site down for exceeding a seemingly arbitrary data limit by 20.89kb, a difference imperceptible even on slow connections. This casts some doubt on the test’s relevance.
  • Page Objects Count: Criticizes modern websites for having over 20 resources, not considering the common use of CDNs, which doesn’t align with current web practices.
  • CDN Usage Recommendation: Questions the necessity of CDNs for all sites, ignoring cases where direct hosting may suffice, especially for sites with unique visitor profiles.
  • Render Blocking Resources Critique: This common fail point for many websites, including major ones, suggests an unrealistic standard for most, particularly WordPress sites.

Fair

  • Meta Title Test: The advice to limit title lengths to 70 characters is noted but overstated. Exceeding this limit with less crucial text doesn’t harm SEO, but the way that SEO Site Checker’s test displays this information makes it seem more important than it really is.
  • Keywords Cloud Test: Lacks substantial value, serving more as an aesthetic filler than a practical SEO tool.
  • Responsive and Alt Image Tests: This test highlights minor issues without specifying the quantity in which these issues occur, which makes it difficult to actually gauge the severity of the issue, or formulate a plan to fix it.
  • Load Speed Metrics: Essential metrics like First Contentful Paint are undervalued by their placement in the report. This strikes us as a poor choice, because these insights color how other metrics will be evaluated,  and therefore, prioritizing these metrics could better guide optimization efforts.

OK

  • Issues to Fix Section: The concept of highlighting high-priority items is commendable, yet its execution falls short by not accurately prioritizing the most impactful fixes for optimizing inbound leads.
  • Social Media Test: Grants a pass for merely linking to Facebook. We find this to be a more pragmatic approach than other online SEO analysis tools we’ve reviewed. However, the direct impact of a business’s social media activity on their website’s search engine rankings is questionable, calling the relevance of this text in to question.
  • Image Metadata Test: Delves into detail with image metadata optimization, a task not immediately crucial for beginners but valuable for deep optimization.

Great

  • Common SEO Issues Section: Showcases meta title and description evaluations directly, offering a transparent and helpful view that is easy to understand.
  • Google Search Results Preview: The visual representation of how information appears in Google search is an excellent tool for illustrating the impact of meta tags.
  • Most Common Keywords Test: Provides a nuanced explanation of keyword relevance, moving beyond simple density calculations to more sophisticated analysis.
  • Keyword Usage Test: Delivers actionable insights on keyword placement. We particularly like how this test focuses on genuinely relevant keywords.
  • Site Loading Speed Test: Highlights site speed as a critical performance factor. This is a crucial inclusion for comprehensive SEO analysis.
  • URL Canonicalization Test: Addresses common missteps in URL management and ensures users are aware of best practices for canonicalization.

We find that SEO Site Checkup’s approach offers some valuable insights, but also risks overwhelming or misleading users with the way it prioritizes and interprets some SEO factors. We think it could be more effective if it took a more holistic approach, analyzing the entire  website as opposed to only one page. We’d also like to urge our readers to be skeptical of the upsell prompts utilized in this report. Like navigating an auto repair shop’s recommendations, discernment is key to identifying truly beneficial SEO strategies.

SEO Audit Report by SEOmator: Useful or Scam?

Last Updated: February 23, 2024

SEOmator’s SEO audit report, with its binary rating system of green checks and red Xs, often oversimplifies the complexity of SEO issues, leading to confusion over the true importance of flagged items. This approach, lacking nuance in distinguishing between critical issues and minor enhancements, may overwhelm users with non-actionable details, rendering the report less useful for the average business owner. It appears to exploit the user’s limited SEO knowledge, mirroring tactics used in industries like auto repair, where unnecessary services are pitched as essential, casting a shadow over the tool’s intent and utility.

A large, overwhelming report overflowing from a computer screen, symbolizing confusion and overload. The report is filled with binary symbols: green checks and red Xs, representing the tool's simplistic rating system. This oversimplification is depicted by having the checks and Xs spill out of the computer, creating a chaotic scene around the workspace.

The report we are analyzing can be found here: https://seomator.com/free-seo-audit-tool. The site we ran through the tool was https://rainbowplumbingnj.com/. You can view the report’s output here.

Here’s a breakdown of the SEOmator tool’s performance, categorized by effectiveness:

Poor

  • Vague Ratings: Provides oversimplified feedback without actionable insights, leaving users questioning next steps.
  • Misleading Information: Incorrectly flags technical aspects and oversimplifies complex SEO elements, adding confusion rather than clarity.
  • Non-Actionable Details: Floods the report with information that lacks prioritization, potentially leading to misdirected efforts.

Fair

  • Onpage Results & Speed Insights: Offers basic insights that, while not entirely useless, fail to guide users on improvement strategies due to a lack of context or benchmarks.
  • Performance Details: Points out optimization opportunities but exaggerates their impact, missing the mark on practicality.

OK

  • Accessibility & Best Practices: Acknowledges important aspects but tends to nitpick, diminishing the significance of truly impactful adjustments.
  • General Observations: Recognizes key SEO practices but fails to differentiate between critical and minor issues, affecting prioritization.

Great

  • High Score Generosity: Uncharacteristically high scores may reflect a deviation from the usual scare tactics but could still serve as a subtle nudge towards their services.
  • Security Flags: Appropriately highlights web server information as a legitimate concern, showcasing a genuine attempt to address an often-overlooked vulnerability.

SEOmator’s binary rating system and overwhelming details might do more to perplex than to empower, potentially echoing tactics seen in industries far removed from SEO. While the report touches on key areas, its execution leaves room for improvement, emphasizing the importance of discernment in interpreting such analyses.

SEOptimer: Another Look at a Misleading SEO Analysis Tool

Last Updated: February 21, 2024

SEO analysis tools can offer valuable insights into your website’s performance, but it’s crucial to sift through their findings with a discerning eye. We previously evaluated SEOptimer, but based on a new evaluation, using rainbowplumbingnj.com, here’s a breakdown of the results – from the good to the misleading.

The tool SEO audit tool can be found at www.seoptimer.com but you can view the report as a PDF here.

Our findings are below, organized in a Poor, Fair, OK, Great scale so you can quickly see what the tool does well, and what it does poorly.

A digital landscape, where a seemingly neutral and unbiased SEO tool, represented by a sleek, modern-looking magnifying glass, is subtly morphed or intertwined with a hidden gear mechanism, symbolizing its true nature of selling its own SEO reporting tool.

Poor

  • Home Page Analysis: Only evaluates the homepage, ignoring site depth.
  • Title Tag Length: Warns for titles over 70 characters, a debatable standard.
  • Meta Description Tag Length: Flags descriptions over 160 characters, misunderstanding their SEO impact.
  • Keyword Identification: Fails to accurately identify meaningful keywords, mistaking common words for keywords.
  • Keyword Phrases: Incorrectly identifies nonsensical phrases as targeted keywords.
  • HTTPS Redirect Check: Incorrectly suggests the site doesn’t redirect to HTTPS.
  • Keyword Ranking Check: Questions the relevance of chosen keywords for ranking.
  • Backlink Summary: Lacks transparency and reliability in its backlink data.
  • Iframes: Misjudges the use of iframes, which can be beneficial in some contexts.
  • Social Section: Misinterprets the impact of social media elements on SEO performance.

Fair

  • Analytics Tool: Questions the absence of popular analytics tools, not recognizing the validity of alternatives.

OK

  • Hreflang Usage: Acknowledges hreflang tags, though they’re not a major ranking factor.
  • Text Content Volume: Accurately assesses the site’s word count.
  • Alt Attributes: Correctly flags missing alt attributes on images.
  • Schema.org Structured Data: Recognizes the presence and importance of structured data.
  • Top Backlinks: Includes backlink analysis but overestimates the value of certain links.
  • Google Page Speed: Incorporates Google’s page speed insights, with a reminder of the universal challenge in achieving high scores.
  • Performance Stats: Provides detailed performance metrics, though they may be too technical for non-experts.

Great

  • Report Layout: Offers a well-organized layout with detailed expandable sections.
  • Top Anchors by Backlinks: Highlights the quality of anchor text in backlinks.
  • Usability Report: Provides valuable insights into usability, often overlooked in SEO.
  • Local SEO: Brief but crucial section on local SEO elements.
  • Spiderweb Graph: Visually represents the site’s strengths and weaknesses effectively.

This evaluation serves as a reminder that while automated SEO tools can guide improvements, their recommendations should be taken with a grain of caution and balanced with professional SEO advice.

Sign up for our newsletter!

Join our mailing list and receive regular updates on how to effectively market your small business, along with exclusive service promotions.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.